[ppml] those pesky users...

Tue Mar 27 13:42:47 EDT 2007

Just a side note ... I guess you mean 6in4 (protocol 41) or 6to4 (also
protocol 41, but using a 6to4 prefix), or both. 6over4 is a different
transition technology which requires IPv4 multicast, which typically is not
the case.

Regards,
Jordi

> De: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow at gmail.com>
> Responder a: <ppml-bounces at arin.net>
> Fecha: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:44:51 -0400
> Para: Sean Reifschneider <jafo at tummy.com>
> CC: <ppml at arin.net>
> Asunto: Re: [ppml] those pesky users...
> 
> On 3/23/07, Sean Reifschneider <jafo at tummy.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:29:10AM +0000, bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
>>>       data point.  from the IETF this week, it was announced that COMCAST
>>>       was  ready to start the largest v6 rollout (in the US) starting this
>> 
>> That is extremely cool.
> 
> note that as near as comcast has saidin public meetings the v6 rollout
> they are talking about is ONLY for their management capabilities, it
> does NOT include user-v6 access... (aside from existing 6-over-4
> tunnels that any providers don't inhibit already).
> 
> -chris
> _______________________________________________
> This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
> (PPML at arin.net).
> Manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml

**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.