[ppml] IPv4 wind-down

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:37:45PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> An above ground v4 trade would be helpful. Allowing V4 to be
> treated as property, at least for legacy space, would be
> required. The economics of that are interesting, and the
> outcome predictable. Seems like a smoother transition
> than tossing a bomb into the problem like the aforementioned
> policy seems 
> to do, IMHO.

Note, you do not have to treat addresses as property to enable a
range of addresses to be registered to a new owner.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070321/d35d2dfd/attachment.sig>