[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again

Roque Gagliano rgaglian at antel.net.uy
Thu Jun 7 09:43:57 EDT 2007

> ULAs are not intended to be publically routed by ISPs. While some may
> attempt to get ISPs to route them, ISPs will have clear documentation
> saying they are not intended to be used that way, and they are free to
> filter them. And in fact they SHOULD be filtered. (I'd say MUST, but
> since that is not enforceable...)

Should ULA-C be published in the Whois database? what about reverse  
DNS for them, should they be delegated or just reply a NXDOMAIN?


Roque Gagliano
rgaglian at antel.net.uy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070607/e30ad051/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list