[ppml] IPv6, Vista, and the Popular Press
jafo at tummy.com
Fri Jun 8 21:01:54 EDT 2007
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 12:48:21AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
>than 32 bits to be worth the cost of transition, and enough bits that we'd
>never run out, but still small enough to build with 1990's hardware. the
Why have I heard so much about routers not being able to handle IPv6? Is
it really not as big a problem as I've heard (I honestly don't know), or
was the "can be built with '90s hardware" believe a bit optimistic?
Oh, and the urban legend about 64 versus 128 bits I heard from someone who
was on the IPv6 working group, though I don't recall who it was now.
I'll take your word on it, but it's still the case that a lot of people
don't fully understand just how large 64 and 128 bit numbers are. :-)
Linux: Bring back that "greased weasel" feeling.
-- Sean Reifschneider, 1998
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability
More information about the ARIN-PPML