[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Roque Gagliano
rgaglian at antel.net.uy
Thu Jun 7 09:56:32 EDT 2007
more "practical" questions:
why should they be cheaper than PI block? do they take less
administrative work form RIR? do they take less "space" in their
databases?
in many RIRs you need to pay a "membership" fee and doing so you get
the right to vote in their members meetings, if you get an ULA-C
allocation, should you be considered a member? would you pay your
membership fee to the RIR? again, why should this allocation be
cheaper that a PI allocation?
Roque
On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Should ULA-C be published in the Whois database? what about
>> reverse DNS
>> for them, should they be delegated or just reply a NXDOMAIN?
>
> let's see. ula-c should be assigned and tracked by rirs. they should
> have whois and in-addr.arpa. do remind me how they differ from pi
> space. i keep forgetting.
>
> randy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
ANTEL - URUGUAY
rgaglian at antel.net.uy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070607/96f9b398/attachment.htm>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list