[ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
dogwallah at gmail.com
Fri Jul 6 01:39:31 EDT 2007
On 7/6/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net> wrote:
> >patently false, chaos would ensue for all. "legacy" space holders,
> >"grabbers", and everyone who has to decide whom to listen to when
> >these blocks are announced.
> Why, all they have to do is look and see if the block is registered in
> an RIR.
Don't you mean RR?
First of all we will have to ignore hierarchical authentication, but
let's say for the sake of this argument that you and I could both
register a /8 when it became "up for grabs".
I register it in RIPE, you register it in ARIN on the same day.
Whose block is it then? The first to create the inetnum? The first to
create a route object? if the RIRs have no role in adjudicating
disputes, then what? the courts? where, EU or US?
> If there is no consensus on what to do with the IPv4 blocks held by the
> legacy holders after 20% of the Internet has become IPv6 only, then
> there is absolutely no point in proposing any further policies dealing with
> IPv4 runout, because people really honestly don't want to switch over.
I don't see the logic here.
I don't know why 20% is a magic number.
Some folk don't won't want to switch and might never, Those IPv4
registrations could be in RIR DBs in perpetuity. I don't see a problem
> The IPv4 runout has become Somebody Else's Problem, and as long as it
> is such, Somebody Else is going to solve it.
This proposal would make it a problem for all. Right now it's a
challenge, not a problem.
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
More information about the ARIN-PPML