[ppml] PIv6 for legacy holders (/w RSA + efficient use)

[David Conrad]

On Jul 30, 2007, at 4:22 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com>  
<michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
>> With IPv6, without NAT, switching vendors with PA space means
>> renumbering both the external and the internal network.
>
> With IPv6, ULA addressing defined in RFC 4193
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4193.txt allows one to isolate most of the
> internal network using non-routable addresses. Combine that with the
> typical enterprise configuration of firewall, web proxy, and internal
> email service. You don't even need NAT in this scenario.

And you don't need IPv6 in this scenario. How is this any better than  
using RFC 1918 IPv4?

Rgds,
-drc