[ppml] PIv6 for legacy holders (/w RSA + efficient use)

[Stephen Sprunk]

Thus spake "Keith W. Hare" <Keith at jcc.com>
>> I would say IPv6 PI space _must_ be available or the lack
>> would be such a major obstacle to V6 adoption that it would
>> be a problem definitely needing solution.
>>
>> Some users of IP will deem it critical for their purposes
>> that they have PI addressing.
>>
>> But from what I see in the the current NRPM, there _IS_ ipv6
>> PI space.  Am I missing something?
>>
>>
>> "6.5.8. Direct assignments from ARIN to end-user organizations
>>
>>     6.5.8.1. Criteria
>>
>>     To qualify for a direct assignment, an organization must:
>>
>>        1. not be an IPv6 LIR; and
>>        2. qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation from ARIN under
>> the IPv4 policy currently in effect.
>> "
>
> The criteria for qualifying for an IPv4 assignment are fairly
> restrictive.

All you need is ~256 hosts if you're multihomed, ~1024 if you're not.  If 
that's "fairly restrictive", well, put up a policy proposal to lower the bar 
for both v4 and v6.  There was one during the last policy cycle, and it was 
shot down -- not for routing slot reasons, but due to fears of spammers. 
Another attempt, with more attention to that issue, may succeed.

S

Stephen Sprunk      "Those people who think they know everything
CCIE #3723         are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
K5SSS                                             --Isaac Asimov