[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Review Process

[William Herrin]

On 7/19/07, John Santos <JOHN at egh.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, William Herrin wrote:
> > >    2.  ARIN may conduct such reviews:
> > e. when a route to the block has not been present in the DFZ for at
> > least 3 months.
>
> e. Does *NOT* mean an address block is not in use.  As has been
> re-iterated many times, there are many semi-private networks which
> require non-colliding addresses and are not under the control of
> a single entity, so RFC1918 addresses are not appropriate.

Never said it did John; merely suggested that it was a valid reason
for ARIN to conduct a review for compliance with the policies.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William D. Herrin                  herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr.                        Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004