[ppml] Incentive to legacy address holders

[Ted Mittelstaedt]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
>John Santos
>Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 6:47 PM
>To: Leo Bicknell
>Cc: ppml at arin.net
>Subject: Re: [ppml] Incentive to legacy address holders
>
>
>Under these circumstances, I can't see any sense in doing anything
>else but what we are doing now, continuing as a legacy, non-RSA-
>signing holder.
>

I guess you think your pretty smart in that you have outlined a
situation you think isn't solvable in IPv4.

So, when all your customers have switched over to IPv6 and are
demanding that you do the same, it appears to me you will be still
in exactly the same circumstances.  You customers will still be natting
under IPv6 - if you don't think so, go ask them now.

So what are you going to do then
Mr. Smarty?  You won't have any legacy class C to fall back on since
there isn't an equivalent in IPv6?

People can always justify not even trying to follow the rules.

Ted

PS  Cisco wrote back-to-back translation to solve exactly this issue.