[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Andrew Dul
andrew.dul at quark.net
Mon Jul 2 12:04:44 EDT 2007
In general I support the idea to provide a policy that would allow legacy holders to exchange or reduce their assignments easily. A few notes below.
Andrew
>
> On 6/28/07, OWEN DELONG <[LINK: mailto:owen at delong.com] owen at delong.com>
>
> 1. If the organization does not currently pay
> ARIN
> fees, they shall remain fee exempt.
I would support a fee waiver for a specific number of years (maybe 10?) not an indefinite waiver.
>
> 2. If the organization currently pays ARIN
> fees,
> their fees shall be waived for two years
> for
> each /20 equivalent returned, with any
> fractional /20
> equivalent resulting in a one-time single
> year waiver.
Here I would like to see a cap on the maximum number of years they receive a fee waiver.
>
> 3. Any organization returning address space
> under
> this policy shall continue under their
> existing
> RSA or they may choose to sign the current
> RSA.
> For organizations which currently do not
> have an RSA, they may sign the current
> RSA, or,
> they may choose to remain without an RSA.
I personally believe that any action that an organization has with an RIR at this point should be done with a valid RSA in place.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list