[ppml] FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-InputRequested
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sat Jan 27 04:20:21 EST 2007
Yes, the policy facilitate to create a lie to allow those cases (even dual
stack cases for new ISPs which also need to lie if they don't have a plan,
or start business with IPv4, wait and then get allocated the IPv6 block).
It will be good to know how many ISPs got allocated an IPv6 block more than
5 years ago, and still don't have announced the prefix, neither assigned
just 20 or 30% of the 200 /48. Should then get the block claimed back ? It
is fair towards people that don't want to lie ?
We are living in a lie. Not good. Not serious neither honest with the policy
> De: Kevin Loch <kloch at kl.net>
> Responder a: <ppml-bounces at arin.net>
> Fecha: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:09:11 -0500
> Para: Public Policy Mailing List <ppml at arin.net>
> Asunto: Re: [ppml] FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested
> David Conrad wrote:
>>> Right now, if he has only a few customers, can't get allocated an
>>> IPv6 block. He needs to go first for an IPv4 one. It is an
>>> artificial situation.
>> Are you suggesting that someone in the ARIN region is trying to start
>> up an ISP that will provide _only_ IPv6 service and that ARIN's
>> policies should be modified to facilitate this?
> The policies seem to allow for IPv6 only ISP already, if they have a
> plan for a minimum number of IPv6 customers (currently 200 over 5
> - Kevin
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
More information about the ARIN-PPML