[ppml] Policy Proposal: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "interim" consideration

[Stacy Taylor]

Hi Everyone,
I support this policy as it contributes to the concision of the NRPM.
:)
Stacy

On 1/24/07, Member Services <info at arin.net> wrote:
> ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the ARIN
> Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being
> posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being placed on
> ARIN's website.
>
> The AC will review this proposal and may decide to:
>
> 1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as it is presented;
>
> 2. Work with the author to:
>       a) clarify the language or intent of the proposal;
>       b) divide the proposal into two (2) or more proposals; or
>       c) combine the proposal with other proposals; or,
>
> 3. Not accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal.
>
> The AC will review this proposal at their next meeting. If the AC
> accepts the proposal, then it will be posted as a formal policy proposal
> to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting. If the AC
> does not accept the proposal, then the AC will explain that decision;
> and at that time the author may elect to use the petition process to
> advance their proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the
> petition fails, then the proposal will be closed.
>
> The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at:
> http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html
>
> Mailing list subscription information can be found at:
> http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> Policy Proposal Name: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "interim"
> consideration
>
> Author: Jordi Palet Martinez
>
> Proposal Version: 1
>
> Proposal type: delete
>
> Policy term: permanent
>
> Policy statement:
>
> Delete following text at section 6.1.1. of NRMP:
>
> "This policy is considered to be an interim policy. It will be reviewed
> in the future, subject to greater experience in the administration of IPv6."
>
>
> Rationale:
>
> The actual text suggest that it is an interim policy, however it is not
> longer the case. It is clear that any policy is always subjected to
> changes, however other policies don't have such text.
>
> It may be even considered as a negative "message" for IPv6 deployment,
> especially because the possible "reading" as "not enough experience and
> this is going to be changed, better wait", which is not a real situation.
>
> No financial/liability implications for the community and ARIN are foreseen.
>
> No special conditions, fees, exceptions, etc. seem to be required.
>
>
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>


-- 
:):)
/S