[ppml] Policy Proposal: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "multiple /48" justification
info at arin.net
Wed Jan 24 10:05:09 EST 2007
ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the ARIN
Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being
posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being placed on
The AC will review this proposal and may decide to:
1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as it is presented;
2. Work with the author to:
a) clarify the language or intent of the proposal;
b) divide the proposal into two (2) or more proposals; or
c) combine the proposal with other proposals; or,
3. Not accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal.
The AC will review this proposal at their next meeting. If the AC
accepts the proposal, then it will be posted as a formal policy proposal
to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting. If the AC
does not accept the proposal, then the AC will explain that decision;
and at that time the author may elect to use the petition process to
advance their proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the
petition fails, then the proposal will be closed.
The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at:
Mailing list subscription information can be found at:
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
## * ##
Policy Proposal Name: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "multiple /48"
Author: Jordi Palet Martinez
Proposal Version: 1
Proposal type: delete
Policy term: permanent
Delete section 220.127.116.11. of NRMP.
The current text requires the LIR to justify to the RIR/NIR when
assigning multiple /48s to a single end site. It seems that the reason
for this requirement is the lack of experience, which seems unreasonable
after a few years this policy has been implemented, even if may not have
been specific cases which used this policy section.
It seems useless, now that there is already deployment experience, to
require a justification from the LIR to ARIN for assigning multiple /48s
(or a shorter prefix, such as for example a /47). It is up to the LIR to
require the justification to its own customers and decide according to
it. The LIR will be already responsible to justify to ARIN the usage of
block(s) when requesting for more, and this will already implicate an
implicit justification of this kind of assignments.
With this policy change, both ARIN and LIR staff will save resources in
a justification, which seems unnecessary and should be completely on the
hands of the LIR itself.
No financial/liability implications for the community and ARIN are foreseen.
No special conditions, fees, exceptions, etc. seem to be required.
Timetable for implementation: Immediate
More information about the ARIN-PPML