[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Soft Landing (version 2.0)
llynch at civil-tongue.net
Thu Aug 23 11:16:15 EDT 2007
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Edward Lewis wrote:
> At 17:44 -0700 8/22/07, David Conrad wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2007, at 4:54 PM, David Williamson wrote:
>>> This may sound horribly cynical, but do you think governments will
>>> sufficiently understand the problem and then be able to take any sort
>>> of meaningful action before The End?
>> I'll see your cynicism and raise you. Since when does understanding
>> preclude governmental action? :-)
> A not so cynical question - has any government officially expressed
> any concerns about the IPv4 situation? I mean, is the concern over
> how governments will see this a "boogey man"
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boogey_man) or a concrete concern?
> Will the status of the RIR system be strengthened if there is a plan
> or if the situation is allowed to run its course as is?
not government - governments - see for example:
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
IPv4 depletion, transitioning to IPv6
The list of workshop topics for OGF Rio can be found here:
> I.e., how important is it that at least one of the IPv4 run-out
> proposals make it through the Policy Development Process to
More information about the ARIN-PPML