[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Soft Landing (version 2.0)
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Thu Aug 23 10:14:02 EDT 2007
At 17:44 -0700 8/22/07, David Conrad wrote:
>On Aug 22, 2007, at 4:54 PM, David Williamson wrote:
>> This may sound horribly cynical, but do you think governments will
>> sufficiently understand the problem and then be able to take any sort
>> of meaningful action before The End?
>I'll see your cynicism and raise you. Since when does understanding
>preclude governmental action? :-)
A not so cynical question - has any government officially expressed
any concerns about the IPv4 situation? I mean, is the concern over
how governments will see this a "boogey man"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boogey_man) or a concrete concern?
Will the status of the RIR system be strengthened if there is a plan
or if the situation is allowed to run its course as is?
I.e., how important is it that at least one of the IPv4 run-out
proposals make it through the Policy Development Process to
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
Think glocally. Act confused.
More information about the ARIN-PPML