[ppml] Policy Proposal: Definition of known ISP and changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria
marla.azinger at frontiercorp.com
Wed Aug 22 17:19:52 EDT 2007
Here are my two cents on this one:
-I don't support this unless the definition is changed for Ipv4.
-This prop and ipv6 housecleaning both attempt to change 184.108.40.206 (d). We only need one prop to do this. I suggest leaving it in this one and taking it out of the Ipv6 housecleaning one.
-edits need to be done to change the acronym ISP to LIR.
-edit needs to be done to include rwhois as an option in addition to SWIP
-I feel the requirements here are week. I believe it would be better if this was revised in line with Scotts suggestion. It would be a stronger and more valid requirement if it were revised as follows: A LIR is an organization that reassigns and/or reallocates at a minimum a IPv4 /23 or IPv6 /44 worth of space to their own downstream customers.
From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 9:51 AM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Definition of known ISP and changes to
IPv6 initial allocation criteria
ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the ARIN
Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being
posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being placed on
The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review this proposal at their next
regularly scheduled meeting. The AC may decide to:
1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as written. If the
AC accepts the proposal, it will be posted as a formal policy proposal
to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting.
2. Postpone their decision regarding the proposal until the next
regularly scheduled AC meeting in order to work with the author. The AC
will work with the author to clarify, combine or divide the proposal. At
their following meeting the AC will accept or not accept the proposal.
3. Not accept the proposal. If the AC does not accept the proposal,
the AC will explain their decision. If a proposal is not accepted, then
the author may elect to use the petition process to advance their
proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the petition fails,
then the proposal will be closed.
The AC will assign shepherds in the near future. ARIN will provide the
names of the shepherds to the community via the PPML.
In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on this proposal on
the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at:
Mailing list subscription information can be found at:
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
## * ##
Policy Proposal Name: Definition of known ISP and changes to IPv6
initial allocation criteria
Author: Kevin Loch
Proposal Version: 1
Submission Date: 2007-07-27
Proposal type: new
Policy term: permanent
Add the following section 6.2.10:
6.2.10 Existing ISP
An existing ISP is an organization which meets the following
1. Has IPv4 or IPv6 address space directly allocated
by ARIN; or
2. Has at least a total of an IPv4 /23 or an IPv6 /44 of address
space reallocated to them via SWIP by one or more upstream
Address space directly assigned from ARIN or reassigned from
upstream ISPs does not count towards these requirements.
Replace 220.127.116.11 (d) with the following text:
d. be an existing ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for
making assignments to at least 200 separate organizations
within five years.
This policy proposal would change two things in the IPv6
Initial allocation criteria. It adds a definition for
"known ISP" and changes "200 /48 assignments" to
200 assignments of any size, but to separate organizations.
The term "existing, known ISP" in the IPv6 ISP qualification
section is too vague and does not give ARIN staff sufficient
guidance for evaluating qualifications. This text defines
"existing, ISP" in a precise manner and removes the unnecessary
and ambiguous word "known".
It has come to the author's attention that several organizations
have been refused IPv6 ISP allocations because they were not
considered an existing, known ISP. At least one of these
organizations has a /18 worth of IPv4 space reallocated to them
by various upstream ISPs and over 200 IPv4 customers. An
organization's choice to use provider addresses does not
have any affect on whether or not they are in fact an ISP.
Address space that has been reallocated (not reassigned)
is a good indicato of an ISP as those SWIP templates
are only supposed to be used for downstream ISPs.
The IPv4 /23 value was selected to match the utilization
requirement for the smallest direct IPv4 allocation from ARIN
under current policy.
The IPv6 /44 value was selected to represent a number
of downstream customers comparable to the IPv4 requirements.
Updates to IPv6 initial allocation criteria:
Section 18.104.22.168 recommends /56 assignments in some cases and
/48 assignments in others. The Initial allocation criteria
should reflect the flexibility of these recommendations.
An ISP should not have to provide an inefficient address
plan on their application even though they expect to have
over 200 IPv6 customers.
Timetable for implementation: Immediate
This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
(PPML at arin.net).
Manage your mailing list subscription at:
More information about the ARIN-PPML