[ppml] Policy Proposal: Definition of known ISP and changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Aug 22 16:20:25 EDT 2007

In a message written on Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:51:27PM -0400, Member Services wrote:
> Replace (d) with the following text:
>      d.  be an existing ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for
>          making assignments to at least 200 separate organizations
>          within five years.

In my IPv6 Policy Housekeeping proposal, recently sent to PPML I
proposed similar language, which was discovered today during AC review
of the various proposals.  Here's the language from the other proposal:

] Change I:
]    In section, replace the existing statement with the new
]    statement:
]        "be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for
]         making at least 200 end-site assignments to other organizations
]         within 5 years."

Were both proposals to pass, are these substantially similar enough
that the AC could use either one to serve the purpose?

       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070822/f3a2f261/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list