[ppml] too many variables
John Paul Morrison
jmorrison at bogomips.com
Mon Aug 13 16:11:30 EDT 2007
Can't any network problem can be solved by adding another layer of
Don't all the various nodes in a system simply "disappear" when another
technology comes along to organize, replace and manage the problem
differently? With iBGP there's been confederations and route-reflectors
to divide the problem into smaller pieces, even MPLS to remove a lot of
the scalability issues.
But perhaps in the future, after many more consolidations and
bankruptcies, there may only be a couple of major carriers left. This
would solve a lot of BGP decision making algorithms.
You'd either go with the Red ISP or the Blue ISP, just like politics!
Paul Vixie wrote:
>>> ... is that system level (combinatorial) effects would limit Internet
>>> routing long before moore's law could do so.
>> It is an easy derivative/proxy for the system level effect is all. Bandwidth
>> for updates (inter and intra system) are another choking point but folks
>> tend to be even less aware of those than cpu.
> is bandwidth the only consideration? number of graph nodes and number of
> advertised endpoints and churn rate per endpoint don't enter into the limits?
> at what system size does speed of light begin to enter into the equation?
> (note, as i told geoff huston: if it seems like john scudder's outbound BGP
> announcement compression observations are relevant, or that moore's law is
> relevant, then you're misunderstanding my question or i'm asking it wrong.)
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
> Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML