[ppml] Policy Proposal: Expand timeframe of Additional Requests

[Azinger, Marla]

Here are my two cents on this one:

Not sure if I am for or against this one.  Below is are the pro's and con's I pulled from ppml and I can understand.  Thus...leading to my indecision at this point.

Brief Summary of PPML Pro's: 
-This would allow for fewer potential aggregates allocated to an organization providing more consolidated routing announcements.
-a level playing field is a good thing among RIR's
-I'm sure ARIN staff will continue to be diligent in ensuring that the address blocks assigned are justified over the period 
they are requested for. 

Brief Summary of PPML Con's:
-I think this proposal moves us in the wrong direction with regards to avoiding hoarding as IPv4 free pool exhaustion nears.
-Perhaps policy proposals to change 1-year-supply clauses to 6-month-supply ones would be another way to level the playing field, while moving us in the direction we need to go to deal with IPv4 free pool exhaustion...
-This may lead to hording of Ipv4 addresses.

Cheers!
Marla Azinger
Frontier Communications

-----Original Message-----
From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
Member Services
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 2:09 PM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Expand timeframe of Additional Requests


ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the ARIN
Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being
posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being placed on
ARIN's website.

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review this proposal at their next
regularly scheduled meeting. The AC may decide to:

   1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as written. If the
AC accepts the proposal, it will be posted as a formal policy proposal
to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting.

   2. Postpone their decision regarding the proposal until the next
regularly scheduled AC meeting in order to work with the author. The AC
will work with the author to clarify, combine or divide the proposal. At
their following meeting the AC will accept or not accept the proposal.

   3. Not accept the proposal. If the AC does not accept the proposal,
the AC will explain their decision. If a proposal is not accepted, then
the author may elect to use the petition process to advance their
proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the  petition fails,
then the proposal will be closed.

The AC will assign shepherds in the near future. ARIN will provide the
names of the shepherds to the community via the PPML.

In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on this proposal on
the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.

The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at:
http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html

Mailing list subscription information can be found at:
http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/

Regards,

Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


Policy Proposal Name: Expand timeframe of Additional Requests

Author: Dan Alexander

Proposal Version: Version 1.0

Submission Date: 8/14/2007

Proposal type: modify

Policy term: permanent

Policy statement:

The proposal is to modify section 4.2.4.4 of the NRPM

Current wording:
"After a subscriber has been a member of ARIN for one year they may
choose to request a six-month supply of IP addresses."

Change to:
"After an organization has been an ARIN member in good standing for one
year, they may choose to request up to a 12 month supply of IP addresses."


Rationale:

Currently, all RIR's provide organizations with at least a 12 month
supply of IPv4 address space when making subsequent requests, with the
exception of the ARIN region. The primary reason for this change is for
continuity among all RIR. In doing so, all established organizations
have a more consistent access to IP resources.

The adjustment does not change demand on IPv4 address space. It only
changes the frequency in which established organizations need to request
address space.

This would allow for fewer potential aggregates allocated to an
organization providing more consolidated routing announcements.

This does not change the requirement on new organizations where
established growth trends have yet to be established.


Timetable for implementation: Immediate

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services
Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.