[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv6 Policy Housekeeping

[Scott Leibrand]

I support this policy proposal as a whole.  I haven't closely looked 
through each and every point, but I agree with the sentiment that any 
items that may be controversial should be pulled out as their own policy 
proposals.

Thanks for doing the legwork on this.  Some cleanup is badly overdue.

-Scott

Leo Bicknell wrote:
> There has been a lot of back channel discussion before I submitted
> this policy, and I want to bring PPML into the loop.
>
> This started out as a clean up effort, taking care of issues that
> don't affect policy but simply make the NRPM more confusing.  The
> goal was not to change any policy.
>
> Along the way we ran into a number of ambiguous items that needed
> to be clarified.  For some ARIN staff has some experience and has
> some sort of de facto policy since the written text is not clear.
> For others, since this is IPv6, the situations really haven't come
> up yet.
>
> I attempted to write clarifications matching the de facto policy
> and/or by trying to be as bland and uncontroversial as possible.
> Again, the goal was not to make new policy, but it really became
> necessary to a degree to make things fully make sense.
>
> If there are controversial items I'm inclined to pull those out,
> leaving this policy to be the non-controversial edits.  Any items we
> pull out could be addressed in the future on a case by case basis by
> other policy proposals.
>
> Your comments on this matter are greatly appreciated.
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
> Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>