[ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"

Martin Hannigan martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Fri Apr 27 00:45:07 EDT 2007

----- Original Message -----
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org>
To: Public Policy Mailing List <ppml at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:11:14 -0400

> Actually, Owen pointed out the same problem to me.  I
> might amend:
> Anyone who has number resources from ARIN, a signed RSA,
> and falls under the ISP fee schedule.
> The idea being, end users should not meet the requirement,


> ASN only holders should not meet it, 


> and legacy holders
> should not meet it until they bring their space under an
> RSA (or get a new block under the RSA).  

Aren't strong arm tactics to deny service somewhat
There are ISP's that are legitimate legacy holders. Carrots
before hammers.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list