[ppml] the "other" policy proposals

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Mon Apr 9 18:07:05 EDT 2007


In a message written on Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:47:43PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Leo addressed this, but yes, they are fine for some.
> Most companies want support by default, even for a single 
> seat. There's also the assumption that certificate users can
> use both. Many corporate security policies dont allow users
> to 
> install software, and some have specific restrictions on
> open 
> source of freeware. This is more complicated than it sounds,
> to be honest.

All the more reason to be inclusive.

X.509, PGP, and SSL websites with authentication.  None of the solutions
requires leaving out any of the others.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070409/2d8d6140/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list