[ppml] the "other" policy proposals
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Mon Apr 9 18:47:43 EDT 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: "G. Waleed Kavalec" <Kavalec at BSWA.com>
To: <michael.dillon at bt.com>, <ppml at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:31:35 -0600
> -----Original Message-----
> > 2) "PGP is hard / costly to implement." PGP is
> > available completely for free even for commercial use
> > , one instance is at http://www.gnupg.org/.
> Another is http://www.gpg4win.org/ GPG for Windows which
> includes a plugin for Outlook 2003 (GPCol) amongst other
> --Michael Dillon
> I can't agree enough. The various implementation of GnuPG
> (aka gpg) are fully compatible with PGP and very easy to
> There are a slew of free, open-source wrappers available
> to integrate the tool with explore, outlook, etc.
Leo addressed this, but yes, they are fine for some.
Most companies want support by default, even for a single
seat. There's also the assumption that certificate users can
use both. Many corporate security policies dont allow users
install software, and some have specific restrictions on
source of freeware. This is more complicated than it sounds,
to be honest.
Kinda moot, though. :-)
More information about the ARIN-PPML