[ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4AddressCountdown
kloch at kl.net
Wed Apr 4 11:45:39 EDT 2007
David Williamson wrote:
> I'll openly admit that the present 6-to-4 infrastructure is, at best,
> very poor. Frankly, I'm not sure that an IPv4 core combined with a v6
> edge is any better than a highly NAT'd all v4 world. Moving everything
> to v6 would probably be beneficial to everyone (as a whole), but until
> it's beneficial to individuals (and enterprises), I just don't see it
> moving quickly. Your mileage may vary.
As someone who has to deal with rfc1918 collisions almost daily, I can
see benefits of v6 edge over nat. Of course this would require
teredo and not 6to4 to have only one v4 address per site.
More information about the ARIN-PPML