[ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4AddressCountdown

Kevin Loch kloch at kl.net
Wed Apr 4 11:45:39 EDT 2007

David Williamson wrote:

> I'll openly admit that the present 6-to-4 infrastructure is, at best,
> very poor.  Frankly, I'm not sure that an IPv4 core combined with a v6
> edge is any better than a highly NAT'd all v4 world.  Moving everything
> to v6 would probably be beneficial to everyone (as a whole), but until
> it's beneficial to individuals (and enterprises), I just don't see it
> moving quickly.  Your mileage may vary.

As someone who has to deal with rfc1918 collisions almost daily, I can
see benefits of v6 edge over nat.  Of course this would require
teredo and not 6to4 to have only one v4 address per site.

- Kevin

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list