[ppml] the "other" policy proposals
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Mon Apr 9 19:34:08 EDT 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org>
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] the "other" policy proposals
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 18:07:05 -0400
> In a message written on Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:47:43PM
> > -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: Leo addressed this, but
> > yes, they are fine for some. Most companies want support
> > by default, even for a single seat. There's also the
> > assumption that certificate users can use both. Many
> > corporate security policies dont allow users to
> > install software, and some have specific restrictions on
> > open
> > source of freeware. This is more complicated than it
> > sounds, to be honest.
> All the more reason to be inclusive.
> X.509, PGP, and SSL websites with authentication. None of
> the solutions requires leaving out any of the others.
If people are going to do some development work,
why not do this all at once? I understand that the
existing policy will probably go as is, but it seems
more productive to do all 3 if there is support now.
More information about the ARIN-PPML