[ppml] IPv6 initial allocation policy

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Mar 13 14:29:29 EST 2006


I don't know about a coalition of companies, but, in the ARIN region, there
are at least 2 policy proposals under discussion to try and resolve this
issue.  Kevin Loch and I have authored 2005-1 which is one of the proposals.
Andrew Dul has authored 2006-4 which is the other.  2006-4 is more
restrictive
and limited to much larger organizations (requires 80% utilization of at
least an IPv4 /19 and makes no allowance for sites which do not already
have at least a /19 IPv4 direct assignment).

I hope you will support 2005-1 as I believe it provides a solution to
not only the largest and wealthiest companies, but, also to any company
currently eligible for IPv4 PI space.

Owen DeLong
Policy Author
DeLong Consulting
owen at delong.com
408-921-6984


--On March 13, 2006 10:07:27 AM -0600 "Anthony A. Crumb"
<Crumb_Anthony_A at cat.com> wrote:

> 
> My organization has begun working through the definition of an enterprise
> IPv6 acquisition, allocation, and deployment strategy. I was charged with
> identifying the process required to acquire IPv6 address space from the
> three registrars (ARIN, RIPE, and APNIC) from which we currently have
> carrier independent IPv4 allocations. Our thoughts are, because we have a
> dual carrier connected Internet POP within each of these IPv4 allocations
> we should request provider independent IPv6 space from each of the
> registrars. Imagine my surprise when I found that each registrar has
> adopted a policy that does not allow for the assignment of carrier
> independent IPv6 address space to end customers. This policy runs counter
> to an obligation to our customers, supplier and dealer to provide no less
> than two connection paths into and out of our Internet facing network
> application environments. Not to mention robbing us of the leverage
> needed to be able to shop our very considerable WAN circuit business
> between carriers. Is anyone aware of a coalition of companies that is
> working together to over turn this policy? 
> 
> 
> 
> Anthony A. Crumb
> Enterprise IP/DNS Management
> Global IT Solutions, Caterpillar Inc.
> Email: crumbaa at cat.com
> Phone:  309-494-7816



-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060313/fc9f3f5a/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list