[ppml] for your reading pleasure

[Owen DeLong]

--On March 11, 2006 6:35:53 AM +0000 Christopher Morrow 
<christopher.morrow at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/10/06, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> > I think that the minimum any IPv6 assignment policy should do is to
>> > promote the maximum amount of aggregation possible, and that any
>> > recommendation coming out of the IETF / IESG / IAB should clearly
>> > state that as a goal.
>> >
>> Yes, but, it should, where possible, attempt to do so without requiring
>> sites to renumber.
>>
>
>  but I thought renumbeing was a non-issue with v6... so why would the
> IETF include that wording?


That provision was removed from the kool-aid formulation in IPv6
some time ago.  Current IPv6 offers little more than the original
TUBA proposal.

Owen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060311/0d60f83a/attachment.sig>