[ppml] 2005-1 status
packetgrrl at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 09:19:53 EST 2006
I believe that MacDonald's already has poisonous materials in their
hamburgers so some network devices may not be a problem :-)
Note that the real problem with the MacDonald's scenerio is the reclaimation
of the addresses once the hamburger is eaten and of course the health
problems from eating the hamburger in the first place.
On 1/31/06, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com <Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com>
> > Think about it: McDonalds would qualify for a /31 (or so) under this
> > proposal, as much or more than most ISPs. They'd be able to assign a
> /64 to
> > _every hamburger they sell_, not just the stores. While I'm sure that
> > be entertaining, is this a reasonable policy direction?
> I thought that IPv6 policy already specifies that addresses
> are to be used for Internet infrastructure. In that case
> the only way Macdonalds could assign an address per hamburger
> would be to embed a network device within the sandwich. I think
> it is highly unlikely that network devices containing poisonous
> materials would ever be embedded within edible products.
> So then, where in 2005-01 does it override the existing
> policy and allow assigning addresses for uses other than
> network infrastructure?
> --Michael Dillon
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML