[ppml] 2005-1 status
Howard, W. Lee
Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Mon Jan 30 11:24:51 EST 2006
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Kevin Loch
> 6.2.10 Physical Location
Geography, not topology?
> 6.5.8. Direct assignments to large/multihomed end sites
> 18.104.22.168. To qualify for a direct assignment, an
> organization must:
Are these ANDs or ORs?
> a) not be an IPv6 LIR;
> b) meet at least ONE of the following requirements:
> 1) Have an IPv4 assignment or allocation directly
> from an RIR, the IANA or legacy registry
No justification is necessary? The RIRs required justification,
but pre-RIR was classy.
> 2) Qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation from
> ARIN under the IPv4 policy currently in effect
In addition to currently-held space, or justifying currently-held
> 3) Be currently multihomed using IPv6 to two or more separate
> LIR's using at least one /48 assigned to them by each LIR.
IPv4 policy says "intent to multihome" or something like that. It's
all right with me as is.
> | Locations | Assignment |
> | 1-13 | /44 |
> | 14-183 | /40 |
> | 184-2486 | /36 |
> | 2487-33688 | /32 |
A 13-site organization needs a million subnets?
> For organizations requesting an assignment shorter
> than /32 the
> HD ratio method will be used. For the HD ratio the
> threshold is based on the numbmer of distinct physical
> locations that will be using IPv6. The HD ratio
> used will be the same as in section 22.214.171.124.
I don't understand. Are you counting hosts (Host Density) or sites?
> 126.96.36.199. Subsequent Assignment Size
> An organization may receive an additional
> assignment when it
> has grown to include enough distinct physical locations to
> justify the larger assignment. Where possible, the
> will be made from an adjacent address block.
Why not use HD-ratio? Or topology?
More information about the ARIN-PPML