[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy

J Bacher jb at jbacher.com
Fri Jan 27 14:44:03 EST 2006

Bill Darte wrote:

> The proposal also states "must have accurate upstream
> Abuse and Technical POCs visible on the WHOIS record for that
> block."
> Is this the case now?  Assuming that this were NOT the case...that it
> couldn't/didn't get enforced...would this have any bearing on the
> advisability of implementing 2006-1

None whatsoever.

If a company isn't going to keep its contact information updated, why 
would we think that it would even SWIP/rwhois new data?  And, that it 
would even care about the policy of it did?

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list