[ppml] Policy without consensus?
woody at pch.net
Mon Jan 23 20:01:59 EST 2006
> so do you gentlemen believe that we should allow unlimited allocation of
> IPv6 PI space to whomever wants to multihome and just consider the
> possible routing table scaling problems to be something that will be
> dealt with later? and you also don't worry about carrying over the "IPv4
> early adopter bonus" into the brave new IPv6 world? assuming of course
> that the policy might have to be more restrictive later?
What am I missing? What's the point of having IPv6 if people can't
actually get it and route it?
Nobody's suggesting it be "unlimited." If it were "unlimited" ARIN
wouldn't need to be involved. I just don't see why it's not allocated the
same way IPv4 is. It's just integers, not magic.
More information about the ARIN-PPML