[ppml] 2005-1 status
dgolding at burtongroup.com
Mon Jan 30 16:54:28 EST 2006
On 1/30/06 4:49 PM, "Steve Feldman" <steven.feldman at cnet.com> wrote:
>> It is conceivable
>> that each franchise would be responsible for getting internet
>> service on
>> their own. In that case you would have a /48 per restaurant.
> But would all these restaurants want to multihome?
> I'm guessing not...
> Perhaps the policy should be written to explicitly only count
> multihomed locations when determining the assignment size?
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
In real life, they would use two subnets be restaurant (maybe 3) - one for
manager workstation, one for process control, and another as the "/30" for
the WAN link.
BTW, is the idea to waste /64s for WAN links, or am I missing something?
More information about the ARIN-PPML