[ppml] 2005-1 status
owen at delong.com
Mon Jan 30 16:44:17 EST 2006
On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> cja at daydream.com wrote:
>> I have a question.. with regard to item
>> Have an IPv4 assignment or allocation directly from an
>> the IANA or legacy registry
>> Qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation from ARIN
>> the IPv4 policy currently in effect
>> do you really mean an assignment or allocation under ANY policy in
>> effect? If an org has a micro allocation from ARIN of some very
>> size they should still qualify for a /44? I am not passing any
>> judgement here I am just curious.
> The main intent was to not require someone to actually request IPv4
> if they qualify for it. It was not my intent that micro-allocations
> would qualify though it appears that they would as currently written.
If /22 is under 2002-3 is considered microallocation, then, I believe
such organizations should absolutely qualify. If we're talking about
some other microallocation policy, then, we should be careful about
how we word any changes.
More information about the ARIN-PPML