[ppml] 2005-1 status

[Kevin Loch]

Steve Feldman wrote:
> How would this work for a hypothetical example:
> 
>   Entity X has four distinct physical locations:
>     Locations A and B are interconnected and share upstream providers.
> 
>     Locations C and D are each far away from the others, not
>     interconnected, and may have distinct sets of upstream providers.
> 
> What would the assignment(s) for these look like?
> More to the point, if a single /44 is assigned, is the expectation
> that longer prefixes announced from the various locations would
> be routable?

I believe that is what the folks that suggested a location based scalar
were thinking.  Whether it would work or not depends on routing policies
that aren't really in the scope of RIR policy.

- Kevin