[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer Privacy
J Bacher
jb at jbacher.com
Fri Jan 27 14:44:03 EST 2006
Bill Darte wrote:
> The proposal also states "must have accurate upstream
> Abuse and Technical POCs visible on the WHOIS record for that
> block."
>
> Is this the case now? Assuming that this were NOT the case...that it
> couldn't/didn't get enforced...would this have any bearing on the
> advisability of implementing 2006-1
None whatsoever.
If a company isn't going to keep its contact information updated, why
would we think that it would even SWIP/rwhois new data? And, that it
would even care about the policy of it did?
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list