[ppml] PPML Digest, Vol 7, Issue 30

[Bill Van Emburg]

I, too, oppose 2006-1 as written, but would support a proposal such as 
the one outlined below by Scott.

-Bill Van Emburg
Quadrix Solutions, Inc.

> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:35:33 -0500 (EST)
> From: Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com>
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-1: Residential Customer
> 	Privacy
> To: ppml at arin.net
> Message-ID:
> 	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0601261932400.21336 at sleibrand.acs.internap.com>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> I would oppose this policy proposal as written.
> 
> I would, however, support a policy proposal that states that specific
> ZIP+4 or full postal codes are not required, but that a 5-digit ZIP
> code or equivalent (3-character?) postal code would suffice.
> 
> -Scott
>