[ppml] Fw: IRS goes IPv6!
Craig Huegen (chuegen)
chuegen at cisco.com
Tue Feb 21 16:36:55 EST 2006
Michael Dillon wrote:
> Anybody who points to problems with the global routing table
> is missing the point. ARIN does not mandate how ISPs operate
> and it does not mandate how end users contract for ISP services.
> If ARIN actions create a problem between ISPs and their customers
> then let the ISPs and their customer solve the problem, not ARIN.
> There are far more intelligent and creative people available
> in the ISPs and the end user organizations so let us not try
> to patronize them by telling them that /48 route announcements cannot
I respectfully disagree.
The reason for an organization to get space under this policy is so they
can use it... Most organizations looking for space from ARIN aren't
doing it for internal-only use -- they expect to be connected to the
IPv6 Internet. As such, policies need to be congruent with expectations
and best practice. Sticking our collective heads into the sand and
claiming it is someone else's problem to solve is contrary to that
congruency. Perhaps market conditions (prefix count settlements between
peers, etc.) might change in the future, but for now that's where we
As such, I cannot advocate such a policy. It is likely to create a TWD
or swamp of relatively large proportions as every man, woman, and child
makes a run on IPv6 address space. The goal of a small routing table
must remain; there are some great technology ideas behind that goal. A
policy for PI space must support reasonable adoption today where
renumbering costs are very high, while balancing the future solution
space for multihoming using PA-oriented locators to maintain scalable
Craig A. Huegen, IT Solutions Architect C i s c o S y s t e m s
IT - Intelligent Network Solutions || ||
Cisco Systems, Inc., 400 East Tasman Drive || ||
San Jose, CA 95134, (408) 526-8104 |||| ||||
email: chuegen at cisco.com CCIE #2100 ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
More information about the ARIN-PPML