[ppml] alternative to 2005-1
sleibrand at internap.com
Fri Feb 10 11:42:20 EST 2006
On 02/10/06 at 10:03am -0000, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:
> I think it may help if the policy is written in such
> a way that we separate the requirements for IPv4 users
> from the requirements for non-IPv4 users. We seem to have
> general consensus that most end users who have an IPv4
> PI block should be able to get an IPv6 one. The wording
> of that still needs some honing, but we do not need to
> worry so much about a landrush situation.
> On the other hand, if an end user has no IPv4 PI history,
> the possibility of a landrush exists and the policy language
> has to be tightened up a bit.
> IMHO, a good policy would deal with each case separately.
What if we break this up into two policies? One could be along the lines
of what Andrew proposed at the beginning of this thread, and would give
IPv6 PI space to those who have (or qualify for) IPv4 PI space. IMO this
is urgent, and should be done at Montreal if possible.
A second policy could then be discussed regarding giving IPv6 PI space to
those without IPv4 PI space. IMO this is a little less urgent given the
small number of IPv6-only networks out there, but no less important in the
More information about the ARIN-PPML