[ppml] alternative to 2005-1

George Kuzmowycz George.Kuzmowycz at aipso.com
Thu Feb 9 16:49:28 EST 2006

>>> "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul at quark.net> 02/09/2006 3:35:37 PM >>>
>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>
>  Heck, even if we set a threshold of /16, we'd be saying "anyone who
>  can justify a class B assignment". I suspect that the number of end
>  sites meeting that criteria is pretty large.
>  I'd feel a lot more comfortable picking a threshold if I had a
>  idea of how many entities we're talking about who would qualify.
>  the above, even /19 sounds too low.

The proposed policy as written requires an org who requests an
allocation to be an ARIN member for at least 1 year.  

What justification is there for such a requirement that, when you parse
it, doesn't end up sounding like restraint of trade? What organization
do I have to be a member of to bid on RF spectrum with the FCC?

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list