[ppml] 2005-1 status
tme at multicasttech.com
Fri Feb 3 08:57:38 EST 2006
Can you prepare a revised version? There has been so much
back and forth (some fairly tangential) that I am no longer
sure exactly what the new proposal will say.
On Feb 2, 2006, at 6:24 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I can live with Scott's proposed language, although, I don't see the
> additional restrictions as necessary or desirable.
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
More information about the ARIN-PPML