[ppml] Policy Proposal -- Recommended v6 aggregation practices

[Azinger, Marla]

I dont support this proposal and it is completly unbalanced.  2005-1 is a positive step.  But this just slams the door on other users that need to mutihome to support their customers.  This is a step in the wrong direction.  

Marla



-----Original Message-----
From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
Bill Woodcock
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:50 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: ppml at arin.net; policy at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Recommended v6 aggregation
practices


    >       On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Owen DeLong wrote:
    >     > 		Except in the most extraordinary of circumstances, no ASN should
    >     > 		originate more than a single v6 aggregate prefix.
    > 
    > Not arguing the good or bad of it, but this does take an eyeball 
    > perspective as its core premise.  I think a lot of content people might 
    > find it a little inapplicable to their universe.

Also, this assumes that _all_ multihoming is done with PI space.  I would, 
of course, much prefer to see that be the case, but you might want to make 
it explicit.

                                -Bill

_______________________________________________
PPML mailing list
PPML at arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml