[ppml] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or howto make it less destructive

[Owen DeLong]

>> I don't see why the discussion is dragging out for so long.  This
> isn't rocket
>> science.   Let's just nail the policy down, and move on with more
> productive
>> work.
>
> Is that a statement for or against 2005-1?
>
> As to your statement about rocket science. . . developping consensus
> among
> people with opposite perspectives is distinctly difficult.  I've never
> tried rocket science, but I know of some nuclear physicists who find
> consensus-building to be challenging.

As one of the authors who wrote 2005-1 and a Tripoli and NAR certified
Level 2 rocketeer, I can tell you that rocket science is, for the most
part, much simpler and easier than ARIN consensus building.

Owen

-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060425/e4337d31/attachment.sig>