[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-2: Micro-allocations for Internal Infrastructure - to be revised

[Kevin Loch]

Matthew Petach wrote:
> On 4/14/06, *Randy Bush* <randy at psg.com <mailto:randy at psg.com>> wrote:
> 
>     fwiw, after discussion with jason, i would support a more simple,
>     direct,
>     and clear proposal to the same end.
> 
>     randy
> 
> 
> We would likewise vote in favour of the proposal were it to be
> tightened up and clarified more; currently, the model of burning
> a /32 for router loopbacks seems overly wasteful of address space;
> being able to use a /48 for this would be a far better choice.

Would a /96 be sufficient if the intended use is for /126-/128's?
That might also reduce the concern about them being inadvertantly
announced.

- Kevin