[ppml] Mutating RSA -- Policy Proposal

[Owen DeLong]

--On April 19, 2006 3:36:44 PM -0400 Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz>
wrote:

> Thanks, Owen, I like the effort.  (Hadn't thought of proposing to add a
> new section to the NPRM).  If there's a need for a count of people
> interested in this, add me.
> 
> I have some questions on the content.
> 
> Is the RSA the same for everyone?  I had assumed that once signed, the
> RSA was between the registrant and ARIN, and that modifications to one
> RSA only involved the one registrant.  I was surprised to see that
> changes would go to PPML, I would have thought to the registrant
> involved.  Or plural.
> 
As far as I know, revisions to the RSA are global.

> I don't know how to read 11.1b.  Do you mean that BoT, under advice of
> council, has authority to veto?  I'm just unclear what it means to "have
> the authority" ... "if doing so at the advice of council."
> 
Yes.  It is intended to allow the BoT to veto, but, only in such instance
as ARIN legal counsel (council is actually a typo) feels that the provision
would pose a legal risk of some form to ARIN.

Owen


-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060419/8adaa907/attachment.sig>