[ppml] PI and potential aggregation

[Owen DeLong]

> Very good analysis and I agree with this.
> The idea of reserve addresses here, reverses the position
> of end user members and ISP members. In IPv4, ISP members
> continually come back to the trough and therefore expend
> some effort to be sure that ARIN's policies and processes
> are reasonable. In IPv6, ISPs don't come back to the trough
> and this reserve concept would lead to end users doing that.
> The end result would be that end user organizations will be
> more motivated to see that ARIN is in line with their
> interests.
>
You seem to be implying that is a bad thing. I don't think that
having more end-user participation in ARIN would be a bad thing
at all. I think more participation from more diverse areas of
ARIN's constituency is a good thing.

Owen


-- 
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20060418/8fcda33c/attachment.sig>