[ppml] PI policy discussion

[Scott Leibrand]

Tony,

I've been waiting for the existing PI policies to get the go-ahead nod
before raising this, but now that that seems to have happened, I was
wondering if you, Michael, and anyone else who's interested would like to
work with me to try putting together a policy proposal to address this.
Specifically, I'd like such a proposal to be relatively simple, but define
a way for ARIN to choose PI networks to ease future aggregation.

Would you be interested in doing so at this stage?

-Scott

On 04/10/06 at 12:33pm -0700, Tony Hain <alh-ietf at tndh.net> wrote:

> The primary objection to PI appears to be the presumption of long term
> deaggregation. If the space used for PI assignments has structure it is
> conceivable that service providers not directly involved at a level of the
> structure could ignore the detail through aggregation. This requires a
> little forethought in terms of laying out space. It doesn't require that we
> do anything long term, it just creates the potential to mitigate the concern
> about perpetual deaggregates.
>
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
>