[ppml] PI Assignment Survey Results
Andrew Dul
andrew.dul at quark.net
Mon Apr 10 13:52:29 EDT 2006
Here is a copy of the survey results from those who choose to participate.
You can also see the results in graphical form here:
http://www.quark.net/survey/results.php?sid=28
Andrew
-------------------------------------
1. I support the creation of a IPv6 Provider Independent Address Policy.
Strongly Agree - 19 59.38%
Agree - 6 18.75%
Neither agree nor disagree - 1 3.13%
Disagree - 3 9.38%
Strongly Disagree - 3 9.38%
Total Answers - 32
2. I support an IPv6 PI assignment to any organization which qualifies for an IPv4 assignment.
Strongly Agree - 12 36.36%
Agree - 10 30.30%
Neither agree nor disagree - 1 3.03%
Disagree - 6 18.18%
Strongly Disagree - 4 12.12%
Total Answers - 33
3. I support an IPv6 PI policy which requires other criteria. (Other than any IPv4 assignment)
Strongly Agree - 7 21.21%
Agree - 11 33.33%
Neither agree nor disagree - 8 24.24%
Disagree - 5 15.15%
Strongly Disagree - 2 6.06%
Total Answers - 33
4. Should the requirement of "end-site" as defined in the current IPv6 policy be a requirement for a PI assignment?
Yes - 10 33.33%
No - 20 66.67%
Total Answers - 30
5. I support the requirement that an organization must be multihomed to qualify for an IPv6 PI assignment.
Agree - 22 66.67%
Neither agree nor disagree - 4 12.12%
Disagree - 7 21.21%
Total Answers - 33
6. I support the requirement that an organization must have a current IPv4 assignment to qualify for an IPv6 PI assignment.
Agree - 5 15.15%
Neither agree nor disagree - 15 45.45%
Disagree - 13 39.39%
Total Answers - 33
7. What size of IPv4 assignment should the organization have to qualify for an IPv6 PI assignment?
/24 - 2 6.45%
/23 - 0 0.00%
/22 - 6 19.35%
/21 - 1 3.23%
/20 - 3 9.68%
/19 - 4 12.90%
/18 - 0 0.00%
/17 - 0 0.00%
/16 - 5 16.13%
No Preference - 10 32.26%
Total Answers - 31
8. I support the requirement to assign IPv6 PI address space from a seperate super block.
Agree - 19 59.38%
Neither agree nor disagree - 9 28.13%
Disagree - 4 12.50%
Total Answers - 32
9. I support a minimum size for an IPv6 PI address assignment.
Agree - 26 78.79%
Neither agree nor disagree - 4 12.12%
Disagree - 3 9.09%
Total Answers - 33
10. What should be the minimum assignment size?
/40 - 4 12.50%
/44 - 1 3.13%
/48 - 20 62.50%
/64 - 2 6.25%
No Preference - 5 15.63%
Total Answers - 32
11. I support a maximum assignment size.
Agree - 8 25.81%
Neither agree nor disagree - 10 32.26%
Disagree - 13 41.94%
Total Answers - 31
12. What should be the maximum assignment size?
/32 - 2 8.33%
/36 - 1 4.17%
/40 - 6 25.00%
/48 - 3 12.50%
No Preference - 12 50.00%
Total Answers - 24
13. I support the requirement to specify a reserved block in an IPv6 PI address policy.
Agree - 13 40.63%
Neither agree nor disagree - 12 37.50%
Disagree - 7 21.88%
Total Answers - 32
14. What should be the reserved block size?
/32 - 5 17.24%
/44 - 7 24.14%
/46 - 1 3.45%
No Preference - 16 55.17%
Total Answers - 29
15. I support the assignment of additional /48 subnets to organizations with multiple assigned ASNs.
Agree - 18 54.55%
Neither agree nor disagree - 8 24.24%
Disagree - 7 21.21%
Total Answers - 33
16. I support the assignment of multiple /48s per organization.
Agree - 19 57.58%
Neither agree nor disagree - 8 24.24%
Disagree - 6 18.18%
Total Answers - 33
17. Do you support ARIN Policy Proposal 2005-1 as currently written?
Yes - 18 56.25%
No - 14 43.75%
Total Answers - 32
18. Do you support ARIN Policy Proposal 2006-4 as currently written?
Yes - 14 43.75%
No - 18 56.25%
Total Answers - 32
20. Which of the following best describes your affiliation?
Internet Service Provider - 14 43.75%
Equipment Vendor - 1 3.13%
Network Operator - 2 6.25%
Education & Research - 1 3.13%
Software Vendor - 1 3.13%
Large Enterprise - 5 15.63%
Small Enterprise - 1 3.13%
Government - 0 0.00%
Content Provider - 3 9.38%
Non-Profit Organization - 1 3.13%
Consultant - 2 6.25%
Internet User - 0 0.00%
Other - 1 3.13%
Total Answers - 32
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list