[ppml] Privacy of Reassignment Information

[Aaron Hughes]

Businesses are people too ;)

Are you against "Private Business" with zipcode and admin, noc, etc contact info?

Aaron

On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 08:11:47AM -0700, Azinger, Marla wrote:
> I agree we need policy that gives residential privacy but at the same time supports the "research" community.  
> 
> ie Mandatory info is:
> 
> Residential
> 23456
> upstream abuse contact info
> 
> or 
> 
> Residential
> 3V6 (hope I got that right.  Not sure if canadian postal starts with number or letter)
> upstream abuse contact info
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Hughes [mailto:aaronh at bind.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 8:03 AM
> To: Azinger, Marla
> Cc: Christopher Morrow; Divins, David; ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Privacy of Reassignment Information
> 
> 
> Marla, agreed.
> 
> The current methodology is simply to lie, so while several people may have issues with protecting this data, we need to find a way to create a policy to allow for this privacy in order to get accurate data imho.
> 
> Aaron
> 
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 07:56:34AM -0700, Azinger, Marla wrote:
> > I'm not sure if I interpreted Davids question correctly.  However, RWHOIS does not permit Privacy that isnt allowed on ARIN WHOIS.  The information on RWHOIS should be identical to what would be on ARIN WHOIS.
> > 
> > Marla
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
> > Christopher Morrow
> > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:42 AM
> > To: Divins, David
> > Cc: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: Re: [ppml] Privacy of Reassignment Information
> > 
> > 
> > On 4/7/06, Divins, David <dsd at servervault.com> wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Provided an ISP, or other direct assignment recipient, supplies valid
> > > and responsive (24x7) Abuse, NOC, and other pertinent contact
> > > information, a reassignment should be allowed to remain private.
> > >
> > > This has been discussed before and abandoned
> > > (http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2004_6.html).  However, I feel
> > > this issue needs to be raised again as it is more important than ever.
> > >
> > > There are ample valid reasons for a reassignment to remain private.
> > >
> > > ISP's may not want their customers to be mined via a public service.
> > > Many companies only use their assignment for private business exchanges
> > > and do not want a public vector into their block.  HIPAA clearing
> > > facilities, banking exchanges, procurement systems are all example of
> > > viable private reassignments.
> > >
> > 
> > I might have missed something in the policy and this note... but,
> > doesn't the ability to use rwhois and limit access to 'arin' solve
> > this privacy issue as well? With this capability perhaps the need to
> > construct policy around privacy of information isn't necessary?
> > 
> > -Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML mailing list
> > PPML at arin.net
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML mailing list
> > PPML at arin.net
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> 
> -- 
> 
> Aaron Hughes 
> aaronh at bind.com
> (703) 244-0427
> Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
> http://www.bind.com/

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
aaronh at bind.com
(703) 244-0427
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/