[ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-4: IPv6 Direct PI Assignments for End Sites - revised text

[Marshall Eubanks]

Dear Andrew;

A question : it says

      6.5.8.1. To qualify for a direct end site assignment, an
organization must meet all of the following criteria:

<snip>
          2. be an end site;
<snip>

Is "end site" clearly defined somewhere ?

A large (or even not so large) corporation may well act as a transit  
provider to remote corporate locations;
I would argue that the entire entity is a end site, no matter how  
distributed, but I just wanted to make
this clear.

Regards
Marshall Eubanks

On Apr 3, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Andrew Dul wrote:

>>  -------Original Message-------
>>  From: Scott Leibrand <sleibrand at internap.com>
>>  Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-4: IPv6 Direct PI  
>> Assignments for End Sites - revised text
>>  Sent: 03 Apr '06 15:37
>>
>>  Andrew,
>>
>>  This text doesn't seem to match my reading of your proposed  
>> revisions from
>>  your recent message(s).  Can you give us a diff of the changes and
>>  rationale for them?
>
> I added the text to allow a /48 per ASN.  The text is different  
> than what was originally posted on the list last week.  Thanks to  
> those in the background who helped cleanup the text.  The intent of  
> what I proposed last week is unchanged.
>
> The reserved /44 remains unchanged.  There didn't seem to be any  
> vocal support for a larger (/40) reserved block.
>
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml